Class Action Law Suit

A "Class Action Lawsuit is a legal remedy when a person acts or represents for himself on behalf of a group of individuals in a lawsuit where the nature of the other plaintiffs cases are similar, it saves time and cost of both the courts and the plaintiffs hence better suited where the amount of damages are not that big while encouraging the defendant to settle".

It emerged when a common damage or loss was faced by more than one consumer while using a particular product. 

1. A legal claim against the defendants should be filed in a court and there should be an attorney or a group of attorneys.
2. Several people should have experienced similar losses and damages from a particular product or service, in case of side effects from any pharmaceutical product, there should be a similarity between the side effects, or else in case of any discriminations, the type of injury should be shown as evidence and proper inspection should be made against it before jumping to any conclusion.
3. A Primary Plaintiff should be self-sufficient and represent its own class. There should not be any ambiguity or conflict between other class members.

As a responsible citizen, it is YOUR role to take necessary steps against all odds as it could save the future of civilization. As we all know the world is dynamic and there is a risk involved in every situation. For the betterment of human lives, the evolution of laws has been successfully implemented in different situations which give justice to the citizens.

Without the evolution of ‘Class Action Lawsuits,’ there might be an abnormal increment of malpractices, fraudulent activities by different corporate houses and business units. Again, if the business units are proved to be guilty, then necessary steps should be taken against them including a claim for damages. The business can be shut down if the fraudulent activities are practiced repeatedly by any organization.

Please Do Not Contact Mestizo Consultancy For Legal Advice!

Contact Your Legal Representative/s.

R [PEOPLE’S UNION OF BRITAIN] [PROSECUTION]

V

MATT HANCOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DHSC [1ST DEFENDANT]

CHRIS WHITTY, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER [2ND DEFENDANT]

PATRICK VALLANCE, CHIEF SCIENTIFIC OFFICER [3RD DEFENDANT]

NEIL FERGUSON, IMPERIAL COLLEGE [4TH DEFENDANT]­___________________________________________________________________

FAO: MATT HANCOCK, CHRIS WHITTY, PATRICK VALLANCE & NEIL FERGUSON

Served on 21/02/21.

NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION

RE: R [PUB] v HANCOCK & OTHERS [2021]

You are hereby served NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, in relation to the following charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, pertaining to the statements you and the other defendants made, regarding the purported ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’.

SUMMARY OF CHARGES AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS

FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION

For all the elements of fraud by false representation to be in place, under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A knowingly relied upon a false statement.

b. Party B was caused by Part A to rely on that false statement.

c. Party A did so with the intent of causing losses to Party B or for the purposes of procuring material gain.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants have knowingly relied and caused Parliament and the British People to rely upon multiple false statements during the ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’, with the intent of securing the maximisation of UK ‘vaccination’ uptake, as well as past and future material gains.

a (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that COVID-19 [SARS-CoV-2] is “the most serious public health threat since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that statement is plainly false because expert witness testimony and FOI requests show that neither SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 have ever been empirically proven to exist and therefore cannot be the cause of a genuine pandemic.

b (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that “without the social distancing of the entire population, home isolation of cases and household quarantine of their family members”, 510,000 British people would die from COVID-19.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that it is an indisputable matter of fact that this prediction has been mathematically proven to be false by the expert witness testimony adduced in this case.

c (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that the UK Government’s COVID-19 policies “…will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that this statement is demonstrably false, on the ground that an obviously viable alternative was treating the unproven Coronavirus in accordance with pre-existing public policy, without adopting any of the lockdown policies imposed, thereby avoiding the unconscionable suspension of civil liberties and devastating financial losses the taxpayer.

All of these false statements are contained in the summary of the Imperial College Model, written and published by the 4th defendant on 16/03/2020, on the Imperial College website. However, additional evidence shows that the defendants began relying upon the erroneous computer-generated data on or before 01/03/2020, when the COVID-19 Battle Plan was announced by the 1st defendant and quickly implemented by the UK Government, without public scrutiny or meaningful parliamentary debate.

It is alleged that, in causing both Parliament and the British People to rely upon these plainly false statements, the defendants acted dishonestly, knowingly conspiring to maximise ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, whatever the cost, in order to secure past and future material gains.

Thereby causing public sector borrowings, charged to the UK taxpayer, to rise to over one hundred per cent.

Having watched Dr Riener Fuellmich the next question is obviously,  who would do this and Why?...

This interview with Catherine Austin Fitts will explain everything in perfect detail and shows how complicit global corporate entities have attempted to keep the four areas seperated so that the global population cannot see the end goal.